+41.0%
NFLX vs PCG
-21.0%
+62.0%
-53.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.9% | -1.0% | -1.9% | -2.8% |
| 7D | -4.4% | -2.0% | -2.4% | -4.2% |
| 30D | -11.0% | -2.7% | -8.3% | -10.8% |
| 3M | -15.5% | -25.1% | +9.5% | -13.5% |
| 6M | -28.5% | -22.3% | -6.2% | -27.1% |
| YTD | -33.1% | -18.5% | -14.6% | -32.3% |
| 1Y | -45.8% | -21.8% | -24.0% | -44.9% |
| All | +41.0% | -21.0% | +62.0% | +46.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling