+115.9%
NFLX vs NXT
+178.8%
-62.9%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | +1.2% | -6.5% | -5.4% |
| 7D | -4.2% | -1.1% | -3.1% | -4.2% |
| 30D | +5.5% | -15.3% | +20.8% | +5.8% |
| 3M | -4.1% | -43.8% | +39.7% | -3.0% |
| 6M | -20.7% | -18.7% | -2.0% | -21.0% |
| YTD | -16.5% | -3.0% | -13.5% | -17.8% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | +22.7% | -60.5% | -39.7% |
| 3Y | +77.9% | +95.9% | -18.0% | +64.6% |
| All | +115.9% | +178.8% | -62.9% | +92.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling