+70.7%
NFLX vs MTCH
-2.2%
+72.9%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTCH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +0.9% | -1.0% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -8.1% | -1.4% | -6.6% | -7.9% |
| 30D | +1.6% | +13.6% | -12.0% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -7.3% | +22.4% | -29.7% | -9.9% |
| 6M | -21.6% | +37.2% | -58.8% | -25.0% |
| YTD | -18.9% | +31.8% | -50.7% | -22.2% |
| 1Y | -39.1% | +12.9% | -52.0% | -40.4% |
| All | +70.7% | -2.2% | +72.9% | +65.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTCH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTCH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTCH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTCH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling