+70.7%
NFLX vs MTB
+112.6%
-41.8%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.2% | -0.8% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -8.1% | +1.1% | -9.2% | -8.2% |
| 30D | -0.3% | -4.6% | +4.3% | 0.0% |
| 3M | -6.6% | +6.3% | -12.9% | -7.1% |
| 6M | -22.7% | +15.6% | -38.3% | -23.6% |
| YTD | -18.9% | +20.6% | -39.5% | -20.4% |
| 1Y | -39.8% | +22.5% | -62.3% | -41.0% |
| All | +70.7% | +112.6% | -41.8% | +60.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling