+10.1%
NFLX vs MSTZ
-99.2%
+109.3%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +5.5% | -6.4% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -8.1% | -23.6% | +15.5% | -9.0% |
| 30D | -0.3% | -60.7% | +60.4% | -4.2% |
| 3M | -6.6% | -58.3% | +51.6% | -8.8% |
| 6M | -22.7% | -60.0% | +37.3% | -24.0% |
| YTD | -18.9% | -75.2% | +56.3% | -20.2% |
| 1Y | -39.8% | -19.9% | -19.9% | -35.0% |
| All | +10.1% | -99.2% | +109.3% | +3.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling