-35.7%
NFLX vs MDLZ
+3.7%
-39.3%
-45.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MDLZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | 0.0% | +1.9% | +1.8% |
| 7D | -1.1% | +1.9% | -3.0% | -1.5% |
| 30D | +4.3% | +0.4% | +3.9% | +4.2% |
| 3M | -4.8% | -0.6% | -4.1% | -5.3% |
| 6M | -18.4% | +14.7% | -33.2% | -19.9% |
| YTD | -17.4% | +18.0% | -35.4% | -18.2% |
| 1Y | -35.7% | +4.1% | -39.8% | -37.3% |
| All | -35.7% | +3.7% | -39.3% | -37.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MDLZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MDLZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MDLZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MDLZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling