+73.8%
NFLX vs MCHP
0.0%
+73.8%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MCHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | +3.7% | -1.8% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -1.1% | 0.0% | -1.1% | -1.1% |
| 30D | +4.3% | -6.0% | +10.3% | +4.8% |
| 3M | -4.8% | -19.7% | +14.9% | -3.2% |
| 6M | -18.4% | +14.0% | -32.5% | -21.5% |
| YTD | -17.4% | +18.4% | -35.9% | -21.5% |
| 1Y | -35.7% | +17.1% | -52.8% | -38.9% |
| 3Y | +73.8% | +0.7% | +73.1% | +59.8% |
| All | +73.8% | 0.0% | +73.8% | +59.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling