+70.7%
NFLX vs LQD
+15.2%
+55.5%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LQD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -0.2% | -0.8% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -8.1% | 0.0% | -8.1% | -8.1% |
| 30D | -0.3% | -0.2% | -0.1% | -0.3% |
| 3M | -6.6% | -1.7% | -4.9% | -6.2% |
| 6M | -22.7% | -2.7% | -20.0% | -22.1% |
| YTD | -18.9% | -1.4% | -17.5% | -18.6% |
| 1Y | -39.8% | -1.0% | -38.8% | -39.7% |
| All | +70.7% | +15.2% | +55.5% | +66.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LQD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LQD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LQD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LQD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling