-42.9%
NFLX vs LII
-28.3%
-14.6%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +2.2% | -1.3% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -1.2% | +3.8% | +2.5% |
| 30D | -9.0% | -2.0% | -7.1% | -9.0% |
| 3M | -13.7% | -20.2% | +6.5% | -14.5% |
| 6M | -26.9% | -32.5% | +5.6% | -28.0% |
| YTD | -31.8% | -27.4% | -4.4% | -31.2% |
| All | -42.9% | -28.3% | -14.6% | -42.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling