-26.4%
NFLX vs KRMN
+32.3%
-58.7%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -0.7% | -1.2% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -3.4% | -1.6% | -4.7% |
| 30D | +3.5% | -31.8% | +35.4% | +7.2% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -20.0% | +12.9% | -5.7% |
| 6M | -22.5% | -60.5% | +38.1% | -16.0% |
| YTD | -18.1% | -45.8% | +27.6% | -16.5% |
| 1Y | -38.3% | -36.4% | -2.0% | -40.0% |
| All | -26.4% | +32.3% | -58.7% | -47.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling