+70.7%
NFLX vs KLAC
+271.4%
-200.7%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | KLAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -3.2% | +2.2% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -8.1% | +6.2% | -14.3% | -8.7% |
| 30D | -0.3% | -5.0% | +4.7% | 0.0% |
| 3M | -6.6% | -14.4% | +7.8% | -7.3% |
| 6M | -22.7% | +28.3% | -51.0% | -29.6% |
| YTD | -18.9% | +51.1% | -70.0% | -29.9% |
| 1Y | -39.8% | +100.4% | -140.2% | -52.1% |
| All | +70.7% | +271.4% | -200.7% | +14.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KLAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KLAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KLAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KLAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling