+29.9%
NFLX vs IBIT
+51.5%
-21.5%
-53.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | IBIT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -1.3% | +2.2% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -2.4% | +5.0% | +2.9% |
| 30D | -9.0% | -9.1% | +0.1% | -7.9% |
| 3M | -13.7% | +15.0% | -28.7% | -15.7% |
| 6M | -26.9% | -6.9% | -20.0% | -26.6% |
| YTD | -31.8% | -14.8% | -17.0% | -31.0% |
| 1Y | -42.1% | -28.1% | -13.9% | -40.0% |
| All | +29.9% | +51.5% | -21.5% | +19.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IBIT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IBIT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IBIT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IBIT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling