-46.2%
NFLX vs GTLB
+3.8%
-49.9%
-46.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +1.0% | -1.8% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -0.7% | -1.2% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -11.9% | -10.2% | -1.7% | -11.2% |
| 3M | -20.6% | +10.1% | -30.7% | -21.3% |
| 6M | -29.0% | +116.5% | -145.5% | -32.5% |
| YTD | -33.7% | +27.2% | -60.9% | -34.6% |
| 1Y | -46.2% | +8.6% | -54.7% | -45.4% |
| All | -46.2% | +3.8% | -49.9% | -45.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling