-37.8%
NFLX vs GTLB
+14.4%
-52.2%
-46.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | +1.1% | -6.4% | -5.4% |
| 7D | -4.2% | +11.1% | -15.3% | -5.1% |
| 30D | +5.5% | +37.8% | -32.3% | +3.0% |
| 3M | -4.1% | +61.6% | -65.6% | -7.5% |
| 6M | -20.7% | +98.9% | -119.6% | -24.5% |
| YTD | -16.5% | +32.8% | -49.3% | -18.3% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | +14.7% | -52.4% | -37.3% |
| All | -37.8% | +14.4% | -52.2% | -37.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling