+41.0%
NFLX vs GFS
-16.8%
+57.8%
-53.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GFS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.9% | -0.5% | -2.3% | -2.9% |
| 7D | -4.4% | +17.2% | -21.6% | -4.7% |
| 30D | -11.0% | -8.7% | -2.3% | -10.9% |
| 3M | -15.5% | -19.7% | +4.1% | -15.0% |
| 6M | -28.5% | -40.7% | +12.2% | -27.5% |
| YTD | -33.1% | +22.5% | -55.7% | -39.0% |
| 1Y | -45.8% | +25.2% | -71.1% | -50.9% |
| All | +41.0% | -16.8% | +57.8% | +32.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling