-42.9%
NFLX vs EPAM
-11.8%
-31.2%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -1.6% | +2.4% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +2.6% | +9.1% | -6.5% | +1.2% |
| 30D | -9.0% | +38.5% | -47.5% | -13.9% |
| 3M | -13.7% | +61.0% | -74.7% | -20.3% |
| 6M | -26.9% | +58.0% | -84.9% | -33.1% |
| YTD | -31.8% | -23.5% | -8.3% | -32.2% |
| All | -42.9% | -11.8% | -31.2% | -41.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling