-20.7%
NFLX vs ECHO
-24.1%
+3.4%
-37.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | 0.0% | -5.4% | -5.3% |
| 7D | -4.2% | +3.4% | -7.7% | -4.4% |
| 30D | +5.5% | +2.4% | +3.1% | +5.2% |
| 3M | -4.1% | -28.0% | +23.9% | -2.3% |
| 6M | -20.7% | -21.2% | +0.6% | -20.1% |
| All | -20.7% | -24.1% | +3.4% | -20.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling