+105.4%
NFLX vs BBIO
+136.9%
-31.4%
-75.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -4.7% | +4.7% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -8.1% | -3.9% | -4.2% | -7.7% |
| 30D | +1.6% | -13.4% | +15.0% | +3.2% |
| 3M | -7.3% | +7.6% | -14.9% | -8.3% |
| 6M | -21.6% | -2.4% | -19.1% | -21.7% |
| YTD | -18.9% | -5.2% | -13.7% | -19.2% |
| 1Y | -39.1% | +36.9% | -76.0% | -42.0% |
| 3Y | +71.7% | +155.2% | -83.5% | +47.6% |
| 5Y | +27.0% | +44.0% | -17.0% | -8.1% |
| All | +105.4% | +136.9% | -31.4% | +30.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling