-37.8%
NFLX vs BBIO
+44.0%
-81.8%
-46.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | -0.8% | -4.6% | -5.4% |
| 7D | -4.2% | -2.3% | -1.9% | -4.3% |
| 30D | +5.5% | -8.7% | +14.2% | +5.3% |
| 3M | -4.1% | +11.2% | -15.2% | -3.7% |
| 6M | -20.7% | +12.5% | -33.2% | -20.0% |
| YTD | -16.5% | -2.2% | -14.4% | -16.4% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | +44.4% | -82.2% | -38.4% |
| All | -37.8% | +44.0% | -81.8% | -38.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling