+74.4%
NFLX vs ASML
+164.3%
-89.9%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ASML | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | +4.2% | -9.5% | -6.0% |
| 7D | -4.2% | +1.1% | -5.3% | -4.4% |
| 30D | +5.5% | +2.2% | +3.3% | +4.9% |
| 3M | -4.1% | -2.3% | -1.8% | -4.8% |
| 6M | -20.7% | +23.0% | -43.7% | -25.7% |
| YTD | -16.5% | +61.1% | -77.6% | -27.7% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | +129.1% | -166.9% | -52.1% |
| All | +74.4% | +164.3% | -89.9% | +9.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ASML.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ASML return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ASML return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ASML wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling