+74.4%
NFLX vs AMAT
+202.3%
-127.9%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | +4.3% | -9.7% | -5.6% |
| 7D | -4.2% | -1.5% | -2.7% | -4.2% |
| 30D | +5.5% | -14.8% | +20.3% | +6.6% |
| 3M | -4.1% | -9.3% | +5.2% | -5.5% |
| 6M | -20.7% | +27.4% | -48.1% | -26.6% |
| YTD | -16.5% | +77.6% | -94.1% | -28.0% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | +188.9% | -226.7% | -52.5% |
| All | +74.4% | +202.3% | -127.9% | +33.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling