+327.1%
NET vs GLDM
+128.8%
+198.3%
-45.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -0.9% | -1.1% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -7.0% | -0.5% | -6.4% | -6.9% |
| 30D | -4.8% | +4.4% | -9.2% | -5.3% |
| 3M | +3.8% | -1.1% | +4.9% | +3.7% |
| 6M | +50.0% | -13.7% | +63.7% | +51.0% |
| YTD | +41.5% | +2.8% | +38.7% | +38.4% |
| 1Y | +32.8% | +24.8% | +8.0% | +24.5% |
| All | +327.1% | +128.8% | +198.3% | +200.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling