+327.1%
NET vs ECHO
+423.0%
-95.9%
-45.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | 0.0% | -2.0% | -2.0% |
| 7D | -7.0% | +3.4% | -10.4% | -7.3% |
| 30D | -4.8% | +2.4% | -7.2% | -5.0% |
| 3M | +3.8% | -28.0% | +31.8% | +6.8% |
| 6M | +50.0% | -21.2% | +71.3% | +52.1% |
| YTD | +41.5% | -17.4% | +58.9% | +42.4% |
| 1Y | +32.8% | +33.6% | -0.8% | +27.3% |
| All | +327.1% | +423.0% | -95.9% | +242.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling