+146.9%
NEM vs XLP
+40.8%
+106.1%
-62.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | -1.3% | +2.3% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +13.4% | +0.7% | +12.7% | +13.1% |
| 30D | +6.5% | +10.3% | -3.8% | +1.6% |
| 3M | +14.9% | +6.5% | +8.4% | +11.3% |
| 6M | +5.5% | +8.4% | -2.9% | +0.6% |
| YTD | +21.9% | +18.2% | +3.7% | +10.2% |
| 1Y | +47.9% | +22.4% | +25.5% | +30.8% |
| 3Y | +238.2% | +41.9% | +196.3% | +169.5% |
| All | +146.9% | +40.8% | +106.1% | +99.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling