+60.7%
NEM vs TRGP
+82.5%
-21.8%
-32.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -0.6% | +1.1% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +0.1% | -1.1% | -1.0% |
| 30D | +7.8% | +8.0% | -0.2% | +8.4% |
| 3M | +30.2% | +8.3% | +22.0% | +30.8% |
| 6M | +9.6% | +23.9% | -14.3% | +7.8% |
| YTD | +27.8% | +59.6% | -31.8% | +20.0% |
| 1Y | +60.7% | +79.4% | -18.7% | +50.7% |
| All | +60.7% | +82.5% | -21.8% | +50.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling