+51.1%
NEM vs TRGP
+89.5%
-38.4%
-32.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.9% | -4.5% | +14.4% | +9.0% |
| 7D | +3.7% | -6.5% | +10.1% | +2.6% |
| 30D | +2.0% | -0.4% | +2.4% | +1.7% |
| 3M | +21.1% | +8.8% | +12.3% | +21.4% |
| 6M | +9.5% | +11.0% | -1.5% | +9.0% |
| YTD | +19.1% | +57.4% | -38.3% | +6.9% |
| 1Y | +51.1% | +87.9% | -36.8% | +31.2% |
| All | +51.1% | +89.5% | -38.4% | +31.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling