+243.5%
NEM vs MDLZ
-2.8%
+246.3%
-36.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MDLZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | +0.1% | -2.1% | -2.0% |
| 7D | -3.3% | +1.7% | -4.9% | -3.4% |
| 30D | +7.8% | +1.1% | +6.7% | +7.7% |
| 3M | +36.3% | -1.8% | +38.1% | +36.6% |
| 6M | +6.6% | +12.3% | -5.7% | +4.4% |
| YTD | +27.1% | +18.0% | +9.1% | +23.9% |
| 1Y | +62.3% | +3.8% | +58.5% | +61.6% |
| All | +243.5% | -2.8% | +246.3% | +238.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MDLZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MDLZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MDLZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MDLZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling