+238.2%
NEM vs GLDM
+104.2%
+134.0%
-36.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | -0.8% | +1.8% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +13.4% | +4.7% | +8.8% | +6.7% |
| 30D | +6.5% | -0.9% | +7.4% | +8.2% |
| 3M | +14.9% | -4.3% | +19.2% | +23.2% |
| 6M | +5.5% | -13.4% | +18.9% | +30.7% |
| YTD | +21.9% | -5.8% | +27.7% | +32.1% |
| 1Y | +47.9% | +2.1% | +45.8% | +42.7% |
| 3Y | +238.2% | +105.0% | +133.2% | +5.2% |
| All | +238.2% | +104.2% | +134.0% | +5.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling