+253.0%
NEM vs CSGP
-61.9%
+315.0%
-36.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CSGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -2.4% | +0.6% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -4.1% | +4.4% | +0.5% |
| 30D | +23.1% | +2.3% | +20.8% | +22.8% |
| 3M | +18.5% | -8.2% | +26.7% | +19.1% |
| 6M | +7.8% | -35.1% | +42.8% | +12.8% |
| YTD | +29.1% | -54.0% | +83.1% | +42.3% |
| 1Y | +72.7% | -65.3% | +138.0% | +101.2% |
| All | +253.0% | -61.9% | +315.0% | +288.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CSGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CSGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CSGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CSGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling