+143.1%
NEM vs ALHC
-28.9%
+172.0%
-62.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | 0.0% | -1.8% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -0.6% | +0.9% | +0.3% |
| 30D | +23.1% | -1.0% | +24.1% | +23.1% |
| 3M | +18.5% | -10.2% | +28.6% | +18.6% |
| 6M | +7.8% | -28.3% | +36.1% | +8.9% |
| YTD | +29.1% | -31.4% | +60.6% | +30.7% |
| 1Y | +72.7% | -16.9% | +89.6% | +73.0% |
| 3Y | +248.7% | +135.5% | +113.3% | +225.1% |
| 5Y | +148.7% | -33.6% | +182.3% | +143.8% |
| All | +143.1% | -28.9% | +172.0% | +134.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling