+31.3%
NEE vs VIK
+236.8%
-205.5%
-23.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VIK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | +2.6% | -2.2% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +3.6% | -2.5% | +0.9% |
| 30D | -0.2% | -16.7% | +16.5% | +0.6% |
| 3M | +0.5% | -1.1% | +1.6% | +0.5% |
| 6M | -6.5% | +27.8% | -34.3% | -7.9% |
| YTD | +6.7% | +23.3% | -16.6% | +5.1% |
| 1Y | +23.6% | +38.2% | -14.6% | +21.0% |
| All | +31.3% | +236.8% | -205.5% | +19.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VIK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VIK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VIK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VIK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling