+33.5%
NEE vs SPYM
+75.9%
-42.5%
-28.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SPYM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -0.6% | +0.3% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -1.9% | -2.0% | +0.1% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -3.1% | -1.6% | -1.5% | -2.6% |
| 3M | -2.4% | +4.7% | -7.2% | -4.0% |
| 6M | -8.6% | +12.6% | -21.2% | -12.5% |
| YTD | +4.9% | +11.8% | -6.9% | +0.6% |
| 1Y | +19.4% | +17.5% | +1.8% | +12.2% |
| All | +33.5% | +75.9% | -42.5% | -9.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SPYM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SPYM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SPYM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SPYM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling