+35.7%
NEE vs MET
+63.9%
-28.2%
-28.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MET | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -2.2% | +2.7% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +1.1% | -0.1% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -0.2% | -2.3% | +2.1% | +0.2% |
| 3M | +0.5% | +13.9% | -13.3% | -2.4% |
| 6M | -6.5% | +34.8% | -41.3% | -12.6% |
| YTD | +6.7% | +23.5% | -16.8% | +1.5% |
| 1Y | +23.6% | +23.4% | +0.2% | +17.5% |
| All | +35.7% | +63.9% | -28.2% | +4.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MET.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MET return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MET return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MET wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling