+71.1%
NEE vs MET
+84.2%
-13.1%
-23.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MET | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -1.0% | +0.2% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -3.4% | +2.1% | -5.5% | -3.7% |
| 30D | +9.0% | +1.8% | +7.2% | +8.7% |
| 3M | +0.2% | +6.0% | -5.8% | -0.9% |
| 6M | -8.5% | +31.1% | -39.6% | -13.0% |
| YTD | +8.6% | +32.6% | -24.0% | +2.8% |
| 1Y | +2.2% | +30.5% | -28.3% | -3.0% |
| All | +71.1% | +84.2% | -13.1% | +30.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MET.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MET return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MET return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MET wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling