+33.5%
NEE vs LUNR
+234.6%
-201.1%
-28.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LUNR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -2.1% | +1.9% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -1.9% | -0.5% | -1.4% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -3.1% | -11.3% | +8.2% | -3.0% |
| 3M | -2.4% | -44.9% | +42.5% | -1.9% |
| 6M | -8.6% | -17.3% | +8.7% | -8.7% |
| YTD | +4.9% | -9.9% | +14.9% | +4.6% |
| 1Y | +19.4% | +76.1% | -56.8% | +17.9% |
| All | +33.5% | +234.6% | -201.1% | +6.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LUNR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LUNR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LUNR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LUNR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling