+61.0%
NEE vs HTZ
-82.6%
+143.6%
-23.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -8.4% | +6.9% | -1.3% |
| 7D | +3.9% | -14.6% | +18.5% | +4.2% |
| 30D | +12.8% | -20.8% | +33.6% | +13.3% |
| 3M | +3.6% | -18.8% | +22.4% | +3.8% |
| 6M | -7.5% | -74.7% | +67.2% | -5.3% |
| YTD | +10.7% | -68.1% | +78.8% | +12.4% |
| 1Y | +9.1% | -73.5% | +82.6% | +11.3% |
| 3Y | +61.0% | -81.8% | +142.8% | +72.9% |
| All | +61.0% | -82.6% | +143.6% | +72.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling