+20.2%
NEE vs GLXY
-40.0%
+60.2%
-21.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLXY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -2.8% | +2.1% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -16.2% | +18.5% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +11.5% | -30.6% | +42.1% | +11.3% |
| 3M | +2.6% | -27.7% | +30.3% | +2.6% |
| 6M | -6.0% | -53.3% | +47.4% | -5.8% |
| YTD | +9.8% | -36.9% | +46.7% | +10.0% |
| 1Y | +4.7% | -55.6% | +60.3% | +4.4% |
| All | +20.2% | -40.0% | +60.2% | +24.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLXY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLXY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLXY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLXY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling