+146.0%
NEE vs GLDM
+248.1%
-102.1%
-45.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -0.9% | +0.1% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +1.9% | -0.5% | +2.5% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -2.2% | +4.4% | -6.6% | -3.3% |
| 3M | -1.2% | -1.1% | -0.1% | -1.1% |
| 6M | -8.6% | -13.7% | +5.1% | -5.1% |
| YTD | +6.2% | +2.8% | +3.4% | +3.8% |
| 1Y | +21.1% | +24.8% | -3.7% | +10.6% |
| 3Y | +36.4% | +127.8% | -91.4% | -1.0% |
| 5Y | +11.4% | +141.1% | -129.8% | -21.6% |
| All | +146.0% | +248.1% | -102.1% | +63.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling