+70.7%
NEE vs FITB
+144.0%
-73.3%
-23.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +1.1% | -1.3% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +2.8% | -4.9% | -2.6% |
| 30D | +8.6% | +9.8% | -1.2% | +6.9% |
| 3M | -0.3% | -5.2% | +4.9% | +0.5% |
| 6M | -8.9% | +17.3% | -26.2% | -11.4% |
| YTD | +8.3% | +19.3% | -11.0% | +4.4% |
| 1Y | +4.3% | +32.7% | -28.4% | -1.6% |
| 3Y | +70.7% | +141.6% | -70.8% | +26.4% |
| All | +70.7% | +144.0% | -73.3% | +26.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling