+70.7%
NEE vs EPAM
-30.1%
+100.8%
-23.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.4% | +0.2% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +2.4% | -4.5% | -2.1% |
| 30D | +8.6% | +42.3% | -33.7% | +8.4% |
| 3M | -0.3% | +60.7% | -61.0% | -0.6% |
| 6M | -8.9% | +80.5% | -89.4% | -9.3% |
| YTD | +8.3% | -20.4% | +28.7% | +10.2% |
| 1Y | +4.3% | -9.6% | +13.9% | +5.3% |
| 3Y | +70.7% | -30.5% | +101.2% | +59.7% |
| All | +70.7% | -30.1% | +100.8% | +59.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling