+70.7%
NEE vs BIIB
+13.5%
+57.2%
-23.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +1.2% | -1.4% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +2.0% | -4.1% | -2.5% |
| 30D | +8.6% | +8.8% | -0.2% | +7.0% |
| 3M | -0.3% | +20.3% | -20.6% | -3.5% |
| 6M | -8.9% | +23.9% | -32.8% | -12.6% |
| YTD | +8.3% | +44.0% | -35.6% | 0.0% |
| 1Y | +4.3% | +53.8% | -49.6% | -5.6% |
| 3Y | +70.7% | +13.8% | +56.9% | +74.5% |
| All | +70.7% | +13.5% | +57.2% | +74.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling