+33.8%
NEE vs APTV
-56.4%
+90.2%
-28.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | APTV | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -2.7% | +1.3% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -1.2% | +0.6% | -0.5% |
| 30D | -1.7% | -10.6% | +9.0% | -0.6% |
| 3M | -1.8% | -35.0% | +33.2% | +2.6% |
| 6M | -8.8% | -38.9% | +30.1% | -4.2% |
| YTD | +5.2% | -41.5% | +46.7% | +10.8% |
| 1Y | +21.3% | -45.8% | +67.2% | +29.2% |
| All | +33.8% | -56.4% | +90.2% | +42.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside APTV.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus APTV return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × APTV return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded APTV wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling