+61.0%
NEE vs ACGL
+31.5%
+29.5%
-23.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -3.0% | +1.5% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +3.9% | +0.9% | +3.0% | +3.7% |
| 30D | +12.8% | +13.7% | -0.9% | +9.8% |
| 3M | +3.6% | +8.0% | -4.5% | +1.8% |
| 6M | -7.5% | +13.3% | -20.8% | -10.1% |
| YTD | +10.7% | +11.8% | -1.2% | +7.7% |
| 1Y | +9.1% | +22.2% | -13.2% | +3.9% |
| 3Y | +61.0% | +32.5% | +28.5% | +59.8% |
| All | +61.0% | +31.5% | +29.5% | +59.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling