+50.4%
NDAQ vs GTLB
-50.8%
+101.2%
-32.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.7% | +0.9% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -6.6% | +5.0% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -1.5% | +13.7% | -15.2% | -3.1% |
| 3M | +8.0% | +52.9% | -44.9% | +2.3% |
| 6M | +7.7% | +88.5% | -80.8% | -1.0% |
| YTD | -2.3% | +23.4% | -25.8% | -6.1% |
| 1Y | +0.6% | -3.8% | +4.4% | -1.0% |
| 3Y | +90.9% | -11.5% | +102.4% | +84.0% |
| All | +50.4% | -50.8% | +101.2% | +43.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling