+58.4%
NDAQ vs GLDM
+143.3%
-84.9%
-32.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -0.9% | -1.0% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -0.5% | -1.9% | -2.4% |
| 30D | +2.5% | +4.4% | -1.9% | +2.2% |
| 3M | +9.9% | -1.1% | +11.0% | +9.9% |
| 6M | +9.4% | -13.7% | +23.1% | +10.1% |
| YTD | +0.4% | +2.8% | -2.3% | -0.1% |
| 1Y | +4.0% | +24.8% | -20.8% | +1.7% |
| 3Y | +94.4% | +127.8% | -33.4% | +76.8% |
| All | +58.4% | +143.3% | -84.9% | +36.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling