+91.1%
NDAQ vs BTG
+99.9%
-8.8%
-23.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BTG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +1.7% | -2.5% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -1.6% | +2.4% | -4.0% | -1.7% |
| 30D | -1.5% | +9.5% | -11.0% | -2.0% |
| 3M | +8.0% | +38.5% | -30.5% | +5.8% |
| 6M | +7.7% | +5.6% | +2.1% | +6.9% |
| YTD | -2.3% | +23.9% | -26.3% | -4.3% |
| 1Y | +0.6% | +32.1% | -31.6% | -2.5% |
| All | +91.1% | +99.9% | -8.8% | +78.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BTG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BTG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BTG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BTG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling