+116.8%
NDAQ vs BIIB
+13.5%
+103.3%
-23.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +1.2% | -1.3% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +1.3% | +2.0% | -0.8% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +18.0% | +8.8% | +9.1% | +16.5% |
| 3M | +11.5% | +20.3% | -8.8% | +8.5% |
| 6M | +21.1% | +23.9% | -2.8% | +16.9% |
| YTD | +12.8% | +44.0% | -31.2% | +5.8% |
| 1Y | +25.7% | +53.8% | -28.1% | +16.2% |
| 3Y | +116.8% | +13.8% | +103.0% | +116.3% |
| All | +116.8% | +13.5% | +103.3% | +116.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling