-28.3%
NCLH vs TRGP
+23.7%
-52.0%
-32.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | -1.0% | -2.5% | -4.3% |
| 7D | -4.6% | -0.7% | -3.9% | -5.2% |
| 30D | -19.9% | +9.5% | -29.4% | -13.4% |
| 3M | -22.0% | +10.8% | -32.8% | -13.5% |
| 6M | -28.3% | +25.3% | -53.6% | -17.7% |
| All | -28.3% | +23.7% | -52.0% | -17.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling