-10.9%
NCLH vs STZ
-49.9%
+39.1%
-49.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | STZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | +0.5% | -4.0% | -3.6% |
| 7D | -4.6% | -6.0% | +1.4% | -3.0% |
| 30D | -19.9% | -8.9% | -11.1% | -17.9% |
| 3M | -22.0% | -12.6% | -9.4% | -19.3% |
| 6M | -28.3% | -17.2% | -11.1% | -24.9% |
| YTD | -33.5% | -10.0% | -23.4% | -32.2% |
| 1Y | -41.5% | -14.3% | -27.2% | -39.6% |
| All | -10.9% | -49.9% | +39.1% | -0.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling