-12.5%
NCLH vs LNT
+46.9%
-59.4%
-49.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -0.9% | -1.0% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -6.5% | -1.1% | -5.4% | -6.2% |
| 30D | -22.1% | -1.9% | -20.1% | -21.6% |
| 3M | -18.7% | -7.2% | -11.5% | -16.9% |
| 6M | -28.4% | -3.9% | -24.5% | -27.7% |
| YTD | -34.7% | +5.9% | -40.6% | -36.6% |
| 1Y | -42.7% | +8.4% | -51.1% | -45.0% |
| All | -12.5% | +46.9% | -59.4% | -28.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling