-10.9%
NCLH vs GRMN
+179.1%
-189.9%
-49.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | -1.3% | -2.2% | -2.9% |
| 7D | -4.6% | -1.4% | -3.2% | -4.0% |
| 30D | -19.9% | -13.1% | -6.9% | -14.8% |
| 3M | -22.0% | +14.9% | -36.9% | -27.5% |
| 6M | -28.3% | +13.1% | -41.4% | -32.7% |
| YTD | -33.5% | +35.3% | -68.8% | -42.4% |
| 1Y | -41.5% | +16.0% | -57.5% | -46.2% |
| All | -10.9% | +179.1% | -189.9% | -19.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling